Appendix: figure and table schematics

Appendix: figure and table schematics — This appendix lists the core schematics that convey the paper's logic most compactly: Pacific push versus Atlantic void suction, the hydroplaning transition from dry to effective friction, Pacific–Atlantic sea-level patterns, the feasible region with Ω-NoGo boundaries, spatiotemporal propagation isochrones, and the energy-budget decomposition; data-based plots are kept distinct from conceptual sketches.

The following is a minimal list of core schematics that convey the white paper's logic most compactly (LOCK → Derive → Gate).

The following is a minimal list of core schematics that convey the white paper's logic most compactly.

• Fig A1. Vector map of Pacific “Push” vs Atlantic “Void suction” (core mechanism schematic).
• Fig A2. Hydroplaning/hydraulic-jacking concept: μ_dry → μ_eff (schematic).
• Fig A3. Pacific vs Atlantic RSL pattern comparison (overshoot vs sustained rise).
• Fig A4. “Feasible region” diagram in terms of Λ and impulse J, including Ω-NoGo boundaries.
• Fig A5. Spatiotemporal mapping: nucleation candidates + t(s) propagation isochrones (data-fit result).
• Fig A6. Energy budget: decomposition of W_fracture/W_slide/W_diss and comparison to Ω-NoGo (bar or Sankey).
• Fig A7. Multiphase-fluid registry: η–h–v sensitivity and jointly feasible region (state diagram).

Note: in final production, clearly distinguish data-based plots from conceptual schematics.