Grading and honesty

Every statement carries a grade. [F] forced -- a structural consequence of the locked R19 forms. [V] simulation-verified -- reproduced by the deterministic engine. [L] measured -- a real promoter read or a cited physiological anchor. [O] open -- with a STATED obstacle, never a silent gap. The firewall keeps γ a structural read, never a clinical magnitude.

The honesty layer (VP-SPEC C3). The same grading vocabulary used across the framework, applied consistently: the gene criterion is [L], the loop dynamics are [V], the regime boundaries are [F], and every absolute rate, dose, or clinical effect is [O].

The four grades, as used here

[F] forced: the spinodal, barrier, and bistability are exact consequences of ds/dt = γs − s³ + h. [V] verified: defense-vs-track, the thermostat, fever, the torpor switch, the homeostats, and the disease law are reproduced by the engine (2×sha256 identical). [L] measured: every γ is a real promoter read; setpoints (~37 °C, ~5 mM) and the ~5-10x cost are cited. [O] open: absolute W/kg, the Kleiber exponent, the silenced-switch gating, and all clinical magnitudes -- each with its obstacle named.

The firewall, once more

γ reads promoter switch-threshold STRUCTURE only. It is never a temperature, metabolic rate, glucose level, HbA1c, dose, or clinical effect. The disease and restoration chapters are falsifiable hypotheses grounded in the foundational setpoint mechanism, not medical advice; there is no clinical responsibility.

No tuning

Every γ is a measured input; spinodal and barrier are the locked R19 forms; the disease forcing/gain descriptors are declared and cited, never fitted to hit a number. The engine is deterministic (SEED 19) and re-derives the cross-species reads offline bit-for-bit.