Reproducibility bundle and file map

Reproducibility bundle and file map — Every quantitative claim added in r17 is reproducible from a single bundle, atl_bundle/. This section is the file map required by the r17 principles: it introduces each file, states what it computes, and links it to the in-text claim and to an automated check.

Every quantitative claim added in r17 is reproducible from a single bundle, atl_bundle/ . This section is the file map required by the r17 principles: it introduces each file, states what it computes, and links it to the in-text claim and to an automated check.

Every quantitative claim added in r17 is reproducible from a single bundle, atl_bundle/. This section is the file map required by the r17 principles: it introduces each file, states what it computes, and links it to the in-text claim and to an automated check.

How to reproduce (two commands).

python atl_bundle/validate_all.py → prints a ledger and the line 39/39 PASS (each check re-derives a number used in this paper or anchors it to independent data; several checks verify an honest HOLD/negative verdict; seeds are fixed; pure numpy/scipy).
sha256sum -c atl_bundle/SHA256SUMS.txt → OK for every engine script, result array, and figure (integrity).

Each engine script writes a .npz into atl_bundle/results/ and (where relevant) a .png into atl_bundle/figures/; atl_bundle/LEDGER.md tabulates claim → script → result → expected/tolerance → grade, and atl_bundle/README.md narrates the chain. The authoritative PASS/FAIL thresholds remain in config/constraints.yml (YAML overrides TeX).

Engine file map.

File (`atl_bundle/engine/`)	Computes / establishes	Checks;
File	Computes / establishes	Checks;
`vp_jamming_friction.py`	Liquefaction-by-unjamming friction; μ_eff≈2.2×10⁻³, Δ T≈25 K (no melt)	C1;
`tp_dilatancy_prototype.py`	Thermal-pressurization corroboration; ~82% undrained weakening, sign-rule R_md	C2;
`feasibility_map.py`	Suction–friction Λ∝ d²; critical depth ~12 km; window 12–26 km	C3;
`jamming_microderive.py`	Soft-disk derivation: φ_jam=0.840, zᵢₛₒ=2d, (z-zᵢₛₒ)∝(φ-φ_jam)⁽1/2)	C4;
`jamming_shear_modulus.py`	Hessian/Maloney–Lemaitre: G_relaxed→0, G_Born finite (spine S2.4)	C5;
`p8_magnetic_test.py`	GTS2020 barcode non-periodic (CV≈0.86) ⇒ H2 (resonance) FAIL	C6;
`c3b_braking_and_stripe_logic.py`	Stripe time-rescaling degeneracy (~10⁻¹⁴ km); brake logic	C7;
`c5_velocity_history.py`	Relative-rate deceleration (×2–3 in compilations; ); kyr opening physics-permitted; re-jam brake	C8;
`jamming_bistability.py`	V_crit~mm/s–m/s; velocity-weakening ⇒ stick–slip; “slow”=time-average	C9;
`c2_trigger.py`	Antipodal trigger Δ R (0.6–25 km) <50 km Ω-NoGo	C10;
`c4_scalability.py`	Master-gate split; d_crit∝√(W) (Red Sea 3.3 km, Afar 1.9 km)	C11;
`omega_nogo_check.py`	All Ω-NoGo limits (Δ R,Δ P,μ_eff,h, undrained): 5/5 PASS	C12;
`p1_plate_boundaries.py`	Atlantic active subduction only Lesser Antilles+S.Sandwich ~1815 km; R_sub≈0.06 (UNLOCK)	C13;
`p9_orogeny_deborah.py`	UHP exhumation De≪1 (viscous, Δ t~Myr) ⇒ HOLD; slip De≫1 brittle (prediction)	C14;
`c7_scaling_field_test.py`	P7 field test: observed BDT depth thermal (not √(W)); master gate stays HOLD; cold-craton siting corroborated	C15;
`c16_energy_ledger.py`	Unified ledger Wᵢₙ=Δ PE_basin+Q_fric+W_frac; heat ~few\,% of input; conduction insufficient ⇒ advective flux ~10⁴–10⁶ km³ (falsifiable P4-thermal)	C16;
`c17_energy_source.py`	AR-1 source bounds: H-E1 (stored-energy release) sole admissible class; H-E2-generation (20–200× global heat) & H-E3 (4–6 orders short) & impact (signature) excluded; HOLD	C17;
`c18_p29_coherence.py`	P29 corrected statistics: range null (not value-permutation), look-elsewhere p_LEE, N_eff, jackknife; machinery only (illustrative data) ⇒ HOLD	C18; P29
`c19_master_scale.py`	lab→Earth bounds: dense regime (I≪1) & continuum limit transfer; exact φ_jam & μ_eff=0.002 (needs λ≈0.996) HOLD	C19;
`validate_all.py`	Orchestrator; re-runs all checks and prints 39/39 PASS	all

Supporting files: atl_bundle/results/*.npz (saved arrays per script), atl_bundle/figures/*.png (15 figures: jamming friction, TP/dilatancy, feasibility, micro-derivation, P8 spectrum, brake logic, velocity history, bistability, P1 boundaries, P9 orogeny, P7 field scaling, energy ledger, energy source, P29 coherence, master-scale), atl_bundle/LEDGER.md, atl_bundle/SHA256SUMS.txt, atl_bundle/README.md.

Gate gauntlet (honest verdicts). The mechanism was challenged against every available gate. Verdicts use this paper's semantics (PASS/HOLD/FAIL/UNLOCK/STOP); “39/39 PASS” above refers to reproducibility checks (internal numerical consistency plus a few independent data anchors, several of them verifying an honest HOLD/negative verdict), distinct from the scientific gate verdicts below.

Gate	Content	Verdict
Friction (liquefaction)	μ_eff collapse, no melt (C1)	PASS
Thermal-pressurization	undrained weakening (C2)	PASS (corrob.)
Λ feasibility	suction > friction window (C3)	UNLOCK-eligible
Jamming rule derivation	σ_y∝Δ z→0 (C4–C5)	PASS
P8 magnetic stripes (H2)	periodic resonance (C6)	FAIL (and a non-refutation)
Timescale (kyr)	physics-permitted (C8)	PASS (permitted)
Bistability	no slow-liquefied state (C9)	PASS
Trigger Δ R	<50 km Ω-NoGo (C10)	PASS
Master gate — material law	jamming scale-invariant (C11a)	PASS
Master gate — system Λ	∝ d²/W, not lab-reproducible (C11b)	HOLD
Ω-NoGo (6 items)	all limits (C12)	PASS (5/5)
P1 Atlantic rim (data)	subduction R_sub≈0.06 (C13)	UNLOCK (PASS)
P9 orogeny / Deborah (data)	UHP De≪1, Δ t~Myr (C14)	HOLD (cross-check)
P7 scaling field test (data)	observed depth thermal, not √(W) (C15)	HOLD (master)
P29 event-window coherence	corrected null + LEE + jackknife (C18)	HOLD (method-ready; data pending)
Energy ledger / heat disposal	input vs heat vs advective sink (C16)	PASS (heat bounded; sink falsifiable)
Energy source (AR-1)	H-E1 release vs H-E2/H-E3 (C17)	HOLD (H-E1 only; falsifiable)
Master-scale (lab→Earth)	regime/continuum transfer; μ_eff extreme (C19)	HOLD (magnitude gated; falsifiable)
Absolute chronology	kyr vs Myr absolute	external firewall

Two genuinely open items (stated, not hidden). (i) Master-scale system extrapolation (HOLD): Λ is geometry-explicit, so the lab-to-Earth step is not closed by laboratory reproduction (Section §16). (ii) Absolute chronology (firewall): the kyr-scale absolute timescale is contested by independent radiometric/astrochronologic dating and is adjudicated outside geodynamics, in the Variant registry and P17/P34 (Section §20). P8 is resolved as a non-refutation (relative-time degeneracy), not as positive proof of any timescale.