W.6 Provenance Ledger: which numbers come from where

W.6 Provenance Ledger: See §16 for the run protocol. Items marked M use only the single anchor λ_ref=632.99nm plus CODATA values of h and c.

See §16 for the run protocol. Items marked M use only the single anchor λ_ref=632.99nm plus CODATA values of h and c.

For every quantitative output, this ledger separates three provenance columns: G (geometry: derived from canonical cell, rectification integrals, and integer combinatorics); S (simulation: produced by the released code bundle, see AQD_DOI_bundle_unified_v0.4.0_2026-06-05.zip); M (measurement: external empirical input).

ItemGSMNotes
α=2/πrectification integral
δ=1/π²double rectification
Rₚ/L_q=2/πcontinuum result
σ_geom/L_q²=4/πgeometric cross-section
82+7 core/shell counts3-sector + Legendre shell
mₚ/mₑ=6π⁵dimensionless
m_H/U_lat=1/(5π)dimensionless coefficient
α_em⁻¹≈ 137.036open input (measurement); the 4π(11-δ) form is a recorded coincidence, not a derivation (§14.5)
Lattice unit length a=6.33×10⁻¹⁹ mfrom λ_ref
Lattice unit time Δ tfrom a/c_ref
Tₑ ≈ 1s (electron 1-second)three-fold geometry + (B) reproducible code; see §12 for the (A) full-physics path's reduced status
Surface gravity g_(⊕)=9.80665 m/s²partialpartialcap mechanism G; absolute value M (back-substitution)
Coulomb K_C^(VP)=α_emħ copen input via αₑₘ (measurement); identity kₑ e²=αħ c, §14.5; A^(-1/2)hc superseded
Particle build time Tₚvia ν_p,can
ν_p,can=3π⁴=292.227 s⁻¹n-fold law LOCK-NU-N (§8.0.5); length 292.24 = cross-check
rₚ = D_anch/(6π⁶)=0.84125 fm(✓)predicted under LOCK-NU-N; locked 0.8412 kept as +61 ppm cross-check

Code-bundle source mapping.

Items marked S are reproducible from AQD_DOI_bundle_unified_v0.4.0_2026-06-05.zip (deposited at this Zenodo record) via the entry points lattice_3d_jam_percolation.py, rcross_validate.py, and tools/validate_bundle.py. See §16 for the run protocol. An independent jamming-rotation verification path is mapped in §11.6.5 and lives under 02_lattice_percolation_soc/jamming_rotation_verification_v0.3/. Items marked M use only the single anchor λ_ref=632.99nm plus CODATA values of h and c.

Simulation reproduction map (S-items): which script produces which physical number.

The G/S/M ledger above marks which outputs are simulation-backed; this map gives the granular reproduction path for each, so a reader (or an automated reviewer) can locate the exact computed value without searching the bundle tree. All paths are relative to 02_lattice_percolation_soc/lattice_percolation_soc_bundle/ inside AQD_DOI_bundle_unified_v0.4.0_2026-06-05.zip; each code/ script writes the named results/ file.

Physical output (value)Reproduction: code/ script → results/ fileGrade
Jamming packing φ_jam≈0.63 (zero physical constants in input)lattice_3d_jam_percolation.pyreal3d_run_summary.json[F]
Structural amplification A=a/g^*, median ≈8.0×10⁵ (p10–p90: 4.4×10⁵–2.1×10⁶)soc_percolation_pinning.pysoc_run3_summary.json[H]
Rotation length D=2πλ/A (median 4.96 pm; target 2λ_(C,e)=4.85 pm)jamming_rotation_485pm_study.pyjamming_rotation_485pm_summary.json[H]
Wave-speed c emergence (finite, isotropic, amplitude-independent, ∝√(K))lattice_visible_wave_emergence.pyvisible_wave_summary.json[F]
SOC criticality / g^* pinning (g^*/g₀≈1.14; avalanche statistics)soc_percolation_pinning.py (soc_N750) → soc_N750_summary.json[F]

Honest-reading notes for the two [H] rows (do not over-read the magnitude).

(i) Amplification A. A=a/g^* is a dimensionless simulation output, but the percolation gap g^* self-organizes to the input gap threshold g₀ (g^*/g₀≈1.14). The magnitude A 10⁶ therefore scales as 1/g₀ — verified by re-running the released code at g₀=10⁻⁶,2×10⁻⁷,4×10⁻⁸, which gives D≈ 26,5.2,1.0 pm respectively. It thus tracks a numerical/threshold scale, not a scale-free physical invariant. What is parameter-free is the dimensionless structure (φ_jam, the pinning ratio, the distribution shape); the absolute size of A is not. (ii) Rotation length D=2πλ/A. D=ℓ_rot is a distribution; its agreement with the electron-anchored 2λ_(C,e)=4.85 pm is a central-tendency match (median +2.4%) or a best-bin selection (the 7% window openly noted in §11.6), and the absolute value depends on λ_ref together with the A magnitude in (i). It is therefore an empirical consistency, not a parameter-free derivation of 4.85 pm. The robust, resolution-independent route to a selected rotational length is a spectral length-selection mechanism under rotating forcing, where the selected length obeys L^*∝(σ/ε)^(1/2) (a linear peak-selection exponent, demonstrated by direct simulation); that fixes the scaling, while the absolute value still rides on the medium/forcing inputs.

Note on the (A)/(B) split for electron 1-second.

The earlier full-physics-simulation path is downgraded to a historical-consistency note (the code is not currently in the public bundle); the load-bearing evidence is now two independent paths — (B) the reproducible code in the bundle and (G) the canonical geometry — with the geometry path triangulated three ways, as described in §12. See §1.9 (item A2) for the full audit.