W.0 Result Scorecard (one-page summary)

W.0 Result Scorecard (one-page summary): Everything starts locked, gets derived, and is qualified by a verdict — the whole document in one box. One table separates what is frozen from what is earned.

Everything starts locked, gets derived, and is qualified by a verdict — the whole document in one box. One table separates what is frozen from what is earned. 4π.

Reading aid. This page is a stand-alone summary of the paper's main quantitative claims, their epistemic grade, and the single measurement anchor on which all numbers depend. A reader who reads only this page should be able to decide whether to invest further attention.

Grade legend.

[F]{} = derived from fixed geometry (no free coefficient); [H]{} = derived structure, coefficient closed under the single anchor; [O]{} = open (not derived from this framework's primitives; absolute value injected from measurement).

The single measurement anchor.

All numbers below ultimately depend on one input from measurement:

\lambda_{\mathrm{ref}} = 632.99\ \mathrm{nm}, \qquad a = 6.33\times 10^{-19}\ \mathrm{m}, \qquad \Delta t = 1.86\times 10^{-21}\ \mathrm{s}.

Any closure quoted at [F]{} or [H]{} level does not use any other empirical input; no fitted parameters, no per-particle calibration. See §1.8 (No-Tuning Audit) for the formal proof of this.

ClaimPredicted (this paper)GradeResidual
α = 2/π (rectification)0.6366…[F]{}
δ = 1/π² (double rectification)0.10132…[F]{}
Rₚ/L_q = 2/πgeometric[F]{}
σ_geom/L_q²=4/πgeometric[F]{}
mₚ/mₑ = 6π⁵=2π· 3π⁴ (νₚ via LOCK-NU-N §8.0.5)1836.118 vs measured 1836.153[F]{}-19ppm
rₚ = D_anch/(6π⁶) (predicted; was input)0.84125 fm vs locked 0.8412[F]{}+61ppm
m_H = U_lat/(5π) (5=6-1 gauge lemma, §8.0.6(D))124.69 GeV vs measured 125.20 GeV[F]{}/[H]{}-0.40%
mₚ = hc/λ_C0.9383 GeV (anchor closure)[H]{}by construction
Coulomb K_C=kₑ e²=α_emħ c (not an independent row — see α_em⁻¹ below)2.3071×10⁻²⁸ J m[O]{}identity kₑ e²≡αħ c; the EM coupling magnitude is an open input (αₑₘ from measurement, §14.5), not a VP prediction; A^(-1/2)hc route superseded
α_em⁻¹ = 4π(11 - 35/32·tfrac2π²·3/7)137.0364 (numerical coincidence) vs measured 137.0360[O]{}not derived; recorded coincidence, αₑₘ taken from measurement (§14.5)
ν_p,can=3π⁴=292.227s⁻¹via n-fold law LOCK-NU-N (§8.0.5); length form 292.24 = cross-check[F]{}
Electron Tₑ≈ 1sTₑ=NΔ t, N=N₇₅₀[H]+{}3-way self-consistency
Surface gravity g_(⊕)=9.80665 m/s²cap mechanism derived; absolute value back-substituted[F]{}+[O]{}see §17.4
Motion time dilation 1−v²/2c² (leading)matches measured/GPS at O(c⁻²)[F]{}self-wake/refill competition (§18.2)
Exact factor √(1−v²/c²) (value)forced by finite-c closure + electron-rate isotropy[F]{}value forced; full-vector dynamics open =§14.0.6 (§18.2–18.3)
Gravity time dilation = river √(1−2GM/rc²)exact Schwarzschild, machine-exact to NS strong field[F]{}G-RIVER; v_river=√(2GM/r) (§18.6)
Universality (LPI) = rotor isotropy η_rotor→1EP its acceleration face[F?]{}nuclear p/n handle (§18.9)
Gravity sector vs GR (G-CAP-DEPART)observationally degenerate; no surviving distinct predictionnegativecap=contact only; geom=GR; weight on cosmology (§18.8)
Cosmological (1+z)=n(t_obs)/n(t_em)handed to cosmology volume Ch 7[INPUT]κ_opt=H₀/c; E-COSMO (§18.9)

What this scorecard is and is not.

Is: a compact ledger of every quantitative claim with its epistemic status. Is not: a prediction of any number not yet measured. The framework's current mode is "single-anchor consolidation of a dozen ratios," not "advance prediction of a new constant." See §1.9 (Reviewer Doubt Trails) and §1.10 (Falsification Criteria) for the open items and the kill-conditions.

W.1 One-page overview (what is locked, what is derived, and how verdicts are made)

W.2 Ledger: LOCK inputs vs derived outputs (summary)

LOCK inputs (frozen; change only by versioning)Derived outputs (derived; qualified by Gate)
Canonical length anchor D_anch (canon_lock)Electron radius rₑ=(D_anch/2)δ (e.g., Ch. 9.3, 13.5)
Proton radius rₚ (canon_lock)Connection conventions (e.g., λ_C) and length-ratio invariants (e.g., Ch. 6.3, 13)
Realization length a (VP diameter; realization_lock)Lattice unit energy U_lat:=hc_ref/a (13.1)
Realization time Δ t (realization_lock)Cross-consistency of event counting / time windows (RCROSS, Ch. 11–12)
Rectification constants α=2/π, δ=1/π² (universal regime)Mass scales m(O)=U_lat/S(O) family (Ch. 13)
Rotation-drive length ℓ_rot (protocol/realization family)Anisotropy / SOC / jets (optional route; Ch. 17)
— (no new LOCK in v0.5.0)Easy-to-miss derived results: source-free Maxwell contained (exact curl factorization, §14.0.6); |qₑ|=|qₚ| from synchronized rotation (§14.0.4); particle-card bridge F=mc²/D to 4 digits (§14.1.5); mass-free 633/532 light closure with pre-registered angles (§10.9.1)

W.2.1 Master SSOT table (single source of truth for all locked quantities)

No section may redefine or recompute these quantities; downstream text references a row (symbol + lock_id) only. Values are at canonical significant figures; the Canon § column is the unique home of each definition/derivation.

SymbolValuelock_idCanon §Depends on (←)Grade
λ_ref632.99 nmcanon_lock§11.1external anchor (I₂/HeNe)anchor
N10¹²canon_lock§11.2split integerlock
a6.3299×10⁻¹⁹ mrealization_lock§11.2λ_ref/Nanchor-derived
mₑCODATAcanon_lock§13.5mass-scale anchoranchor
λ_(C,e)2.42631 pm§13.5h/(mₑ c)[F]{}
D_anch4.8526 pmcanon_lock§3.42λ_(C,e)anchor-derived
rₚ0.84125 fm(predicted)§6.3/§11.6D_anch/6π⁶[F]{} (pred.)
α2/πanalysis_lock§5.1⟨|cosθ|⟩[F]{}
δ1/π²analysis_lock§5.2half-wave product[F]{}
νₚ3π⁴≈292.23analysis_lock§9.4n-fold law [MAP][F]{}
mₚ/mₑ6π⁵=1836.118§13.52πνₚ[F]{} (-19 ppm)
U_lat1958.7 GeV§13.1hc/aanchor-derived
m_H124.69 GeV§13.3U_lat/5π[F]{}/[H]{} (-0.40%)
Aa_med/g^* 8×10⁵analysis_lock§3.4/§11.6jamming output; magnitude 1/g₀, anchored to A_geo=cΔ t/a[H]{}
κ_bbp_bb/p_bb⁽⁰⁾analysis_lock§10.3.5SOC backbone occupancy ratio[F]{}/[V]{}
g₀2×10⁻⁷analysis_lock§10.3microscopic gap thresholdchosen
Cross-checks (informative, not inputs): rₚ=D_anch/6π⁶=0.84125 fm agrees with the forced (2/π)λ_(C,p)=0.84124 fm to +19 ppm (the mₚ/mₑ=6π⁵ residual) and lies -0.02% from the CODATA charge radius 0.8414 fm; the length-route νₚ=D_anch/(2rₚ)δ=292.245 agrees with 3π⁴ to +61 ppm. The jamming length route (D=4.8542 pm) is retained only as a Gate cross-check (inter-route D spread 0.04%).

W.3 Gate verdicts and reproducibility artifacts (summary)

W.3.0 Claim Tiers

This document defines “rigor” not as rhetorical strength, but as the scope of a claim and the verification duty. That is, the stronger the conclusion, the larger the required Gate stack; without the corresponding Gate reports, the conclusion remains automatically UNLOGGED/INCONCLUSIVE.

Default scope of this version

This PDF (v0.8) primarily presents conventions and derivation formulas within the Level-C0–C1 range. To use Level-C2+ (quantitative agreement with experiments; cosmological replacement) as conclusions, the corresponding Gate reports must be attached in the bundle and verified as PASS. Otherwise, related sentences are treated only as hypotheses / branch examples.

W.3.1 Gate Status Summary Table (key artifacts; WPVersion)

The table below compresses onto a single page the key artifacts already appearing in the main text: (i) which LOCK inputs are used, (ii) which Gate stack must PASS for the result to be admissible as evidence, and (iii) where in the bundle the verdict log (evidence) must reside, so a reader can find it immediately.

Status notation (summary): PASS/FAIL/INCONCLUSIVE are confirmed only when a report exists under bundle_root/gate/reports/. If this PDF is distributed alone without attached Gate reports, the status is shown as UNLOGGED (= no evidence files attached).
Artifact (summary)LOCK used (summary)Required Gate (summary)StatusEvidence path (standard)
a (VP diameter; SI realization)realization_lock: λ_ref, a; analysis_lock: NG-SYM, G-LOCK, G-REG, G-NT, (G-RCROSS), (G-NUM)UNLOGGEDgate/reports/gate_report_a.json
snapshot/manifest.(json|yaml)
Δ t (time tick; realization)realization_lock: a, c_ref; analysis_lock: AG-SYM, G-LOCK, G-REG, G-NT, (G-RCROSS), (G-NUM)UNLOGGEDgate/reports/gate_report_dt.json
gate/logs/*dt*.(log|csv)
U_lat:=hc_ref/a (lattice unit energy)canon_lock: h; realization_lock: c_ref,aG-SYM, G-LOCK, G-REG, G-NT, (G-NUM)UNLOGGEDgate/reports/gate_report_Ulat.json
derived/claims.(tex|json)
rₑ=(D_anch/2)δ (electron radius)canon_lock: D_anch; analysis_lock: δG-SYM, G-LOCK, G-REG, G-NT, (G-RECT), (G-NUM)UNLOGGEDgate/reports/gate_report_re.json
derived/claims.(tex|json)
mₑ (electron mass; mₑ=U_lat/S)realization_lock: U_lat; analysis_lock: S; canon_lock: rₑG-SYM, G-LOCK, G-REG, G-NT, (G-RECT), (G-NUM)UNLOGGEDgate/reports/gate_report_me.json
derived/tables/*mass*.csv
mₚ (proton mass)canon_lock: rₚ; realization_lock: U_lat; analysis_lock: Sₚ or an event-rate mappingG-SYM, G-LOCK, G-REG, G-NT, (G-NUM)UNLOGGEDgate/reports/gate_report_mp.json
derived/claims.(tex|json)
m_H (Higgs mass; e.g., U_lat/(5π))realization_lock: U_lat; analysis_lock: coefficient (e.g., 5π)G-SYM, G-LOCK, G-REG, G-NT, (G-NUM)UNLOGGEDgate/reports/gate_report_mH.json
derived/claims.(tex|json)
mₚ/mₑ (mass ratio; cross-consistency target)analysis_lock: ν_p,can etc.; derived: mₚ,mₑG-SYM, G-LOCK, G-REG, G-NT, (G-RCROSS), (G-NUM)UNLOGGEDgate/reports/gate_report_mp_me.json
gate/reports/gate_report_RCROSS.json
c²=B/ρ (single signal speed; collective stiffness)analysis_lock: jammed packing; backboneG-REG, G-NUM, G-NTPASSjamming_spine_v0.4/01_stiffness_to_c2/results_bulk/bulkG.csv
G_relaxed→0 at z_iso=2d=6 (zero shear reserve; five observables)analysis_lock: relaxed-G definitionG-REG, G-NUM, G-NTPASSjamming_spine_v0.4/02_shear_relaxedG/results/relaxedG.csv, dos_omega_star.png
forced radius rₚ=(2/π)λ_(C,p) (global attractor; F'(x^*)=-(π/2)⁵)canon_lock: λ_(C,p); analysis_lock: αG-REG, G-NUMPASSjamming_spine_v0.4/03_forced_circle_proton_radius/RESULTS_forced_circle.txt
amplification A=a_med/g^* (structure parameter-free; magnitude 1/g₀, anchored to A_geo=cΔ t/a)analysis_lock: g₀, kₙₙG-NUM, G-NTPASSjamming_spine_v0.4/05_light_emergence_quantum_D/soc_indep_summary.json
manifest+checksums+registry_snapshot (release integrity)protocol_lock \snapshot/* (sealing specification)G-SYM, G-LOCK, G-NT, (G-REP)UNLOGGEDsnapshot/manifest.(json|yaml|csv)
snapshot/checksums.(txt|json)

W.3.2 Reproducibility map: which numerals are forced, which are simulation-measured, which are inputs (v0.5.0; extended v0.6.0 with the drop-in module registry)

Several numerals in this paper are simulation measurements or calibrations that can be mistaken for fitted anchors when they appear in the same font as forced results. The map below fixes, once, the nature of each recurring numeral and the bundle path that reproduces it. Tag legend: [F]{} forced; [V]{} simulation-measured (script+seed in bundle); [H]{} calibrated/locked by a stated procedure; [O]{} back-substituted external input.
NumeralTagReproduction path (bundle)Misreading to avoid
A=880918.977…[V]/[H]verify_amplification_A.py; soc_percolation_pinning.py (seeds logged)measured from the lattice (a_med/g^*), not a free fit; absolute magnitude is [H]{} (A_geo=cΔ t/a, 0.16%)
ℓ_rot=4.8542 pm[V]05_light_emergence_quantum_D/ellrot_verify.pya selected best-avalanche from a 7% distribution (median 4.96 pm); canonical D is 2λ_(C,e), not this
φ_jam=0.633[V]lattice_3d_jam_percolation.pyno identity claimed with 2/π=0.6366 or 632.99 nm (§11.6 non-claim note)
g_c=δ_eff[V]percolation module (Union–Find; seeds logged)the match to δ is an output, not an input
κ_bb[V]SOC moduledistinct symbol from A since v0.2.1
Δ t=1.86×10⁻²¹ s[H]outputs/derived/dt_633.txt, dt_532.txt; gate/logs/dt_candidates.csvlocked via Δ t=Aa/c_ref with RCROSS two-wavelength sealing; not an algorithmic step
N=10¹²[H](declared split integer)a chosen split; no dimensionless output depends on it (§1.8.2 N-invariance)
g₀=2×10⁻⁷[H]SOC input (declared)chosen threshold; A's dimensionless structure is g₀-independent (g^*/g₀≈1.1–1.3)
c_ref (Option-B)[H]realization_lock (value + channel id)input c_ref≠ output c_env=√K; their agreement is a result (§1.9 A1)
Ψ_yield=1.091×10⁻¹⁶ m⁻¹[O](intentionally no code)back-substituted per body (§17.4.4 four-wall); per-body values owned by the Earth–Cosmos volume appendix (v0.6.0 handover); never a derivation
Tₑ≈1 s[H]+electron_one_second.pyfull-sim path is historical testimony (v34); residual O(1) sharpened to gate G-TE-O1 (§12, three-candidate measure table)
χ(633)=89.9378^(∘), χ(532)=89.8248^(∘)[V]06_light_mapping_massfree/ (deterministic; output sha256 gated)zero fit freedom; only D enters; these are the pre-registered B1 numbers
τ_q=1.618659959×10⁻²⁰ s[H]06_light_mapping_massfree/ (README, REGISTRY_PATCH: canon_derived)DERIVED NON-LOCK, τ_q:=D/c by definition; re-deriving c=D/τ_q is forbidden (anti-circularity); realization_lock untouched
absorption-rule table (A/B/C)[V]07_absorption_rule_study/ (deterministic, no RNG; output sha256 gated)LOCK exercised 2026-06-11 under operator delegation: rule B (conserving) adopted — rule A yields identically zero force (bookkeeping and mechanical engines); reduced laws remain rule-invariant upstream of the lock
m_q band [2.28,4.56]×10⁻³⁴ kg (128–256 eV/c²); invariant p₁^((⊕))=gm_(mathrm H)/ν_(mathrm H)=5.597×10⁻²⁹ kg m/s[O]08_gravity_mapping_attempt/, 10_column_engine/ (deterministic; sha256 gated)back-substituted via [INPUT] G/g; sphere branch only (cube retired by recovered 23-volume spec; 3 keV reading retired with engine-internal threshold); residual O(1) = anisotropy η∈[1,1.82]; gate G-GRAV-MAP; no identity with canon constants asserted or examined
Writing convention from v0.5.0 onward: a measured numeral first appears with the inline tag [SIM|script|seed]; an input numeral with [INPUT]. Drop-in module registry (v0.6.0). Two modules produced for this edition are registered for the bundle. 06_light_mapping_massfree/: gate G-LIGHT-MAP-Q PASS (deterministic, seed-free; output RESULTS.txt, 109 lines, sha256 cfa6b40b…900c); carries the pre-registered B1 angles and the DERIVED NON-LOCK tick τ_q; the paired observation gate G-ISO (§10.9.2) is OPEN. 07_absorption_rule_study/: R1 decision aid (deterministic, no RNG; RESULTS sha256 c0966c7f…d6a66); LOCK pending — the choosing act is the operator's. 08_gravity_mapping_attempt/: the light-mapping technique applied to gravity (deterministic; RESULTS sha256 36467784…b66a); it reduces the absolute-magnitude problem to the single scalar m_q with a registered target band (gate G-GRAV-MAP). 09_cap_calibration_attempt/: the calibration cross-check (deterministic; RESULTS sha256 01c49327…4e73e) — O(1) cap outputs × light-derived units overshoot g_⊕ by 20–29 orders; required suppression =G^*; Wall-1/Wall-3 magnitudes partially derived as fall-time tick counts. 10_column_engine/: the mechanical single-column (pressing) engine (deterministic; RESULTS sha256 a8bd09e8…8bd85) — boundary-pressing structural theorem; demand-set arrival speed; Δ p∝ m_q; c-ceiling; 1-D supply axis logged as confounded. Registered-but-unbuilt items remain explicit so they cannot be mistaken for delivered evidence: G-TE-O1 (§12, analytic task), R-OCC1–3 (§14.0.2), R1–R4 and G-GRAV-MAP (§17.4.4). Bundle inclusion and MANIFEST resealing follow the §16 discipline; the registry snippets ship inside the 06 module (REGISTRY_PATCH.md).

W.4 Known constraints / open items (explicit from a white-paper viewpoint)